Go

Free Subscription
& E-newsletter

Daily News Update

RTOG Activates a Phase II Study to Help Determine the Best Treatment Strategies for Patients with Low-Risk, Low-Grade Glioma Brain Tumors

View Comments (4)Print ArticleEmail Article
Treatment remains controversial for patients diagnosed with a low-risk, low-grade glioma (LGG) brain tumor. These patients have significantly better prognosis than patients diagnosed with more aggressive high-grade glioma, and their clinical care often involves ongoing observation for tumor changes with imaging studies. Because low-risk LGG are slow growing tumors, concerns about the potential adverse effects of early treatment on patients' neurocognitive function (NCF) and quality of life (QOL) may outweigh treatment benefits in patients who are frequently young and highly functional.

Although a low-grade tumor, LGG has a significant potential for transforming into a high-grade glioma. "Currently there is no consensus on when and how best to treat this tumor," says RTOG 0925 principal investigator Ali K. Choucair, MD, director of neuro-oncology and co-director of the Brain Tumor Center at the Neuroscience Institute, Norton Healthcare System, Louisville, Ky. "The RTOG 0925 study was designed with compilation of best available data from both prospective as well as retrospective studies in an effort to identify early clinical and neurocognitive changes that could precede changes observed on imaging scans and could trigger early and timely treatment."

The study's goal is to better understand the effects of tumor progression on patients with low-risk LGG. The phase II trial will enroll 170 study participants with newly diagnosed LGG who are undergoing observation alone for clinical care. The study will compare NCF, QOL, and seizure control over time in patients who have evidence of tumor progression versus patients who have no evidence of progression as determined by magnetic imaging resonance (MRI) scans. "Standardized and clinically meaningful definitions of tumor progression in low-risk LGG are clearly needed to further the examination and understanding of these tumors," says Walter J. Curran Jr., MD, RTOG group chair and executive director of the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University in Atlanta. "It is hoped the study's findings will help guide future treatment decisions for these patients."

The study also has an important translational research component that is expected to contribute much-needed information to current limited knowledge about the role molecular markers in predicting LGG tumor progression. Tumor tissue from consenting study participants will be used to evaluate molecular correlates of NCF, QOL, seizure control, and progression-free survival. Such information has the potential to aid clinical decision-making and further the identification of individualized patient therapy approaches.

Daily News Watch Archives
 

I had a resection of a craniopharyngioma five years ago. In the last two year there has been slow steda growth of a cystic fluid pocket which is now larger (9.333 mm)and Dr's want to wiat until July to do another open craniotomy to resect this piece of left over brain tumor that apparently created cytic fluid pockets and they say they will perm knock out my eye sight in order to get this. I need help and direction on this issues because I feel they are not using up to date methods to resolve this issue. I have suggested Proton therapy rather than radiation or brain surgery again- both radaition and brian surgery caused more damage than good and I have gotten some of my eye sight back now. These cystic pockets were the result of a piece left last time (2007) and they say are why I have developing cystic fluid pockets that er progressing slowly but are growing. I am on six month MRI with the wait and see diagnosis but have been told July 2012 or sooner I should have a craniotomy again to attempt to remove these fluid cysts. I need some help and hope there is better treatment for this cystic pocket. I have all my MRI's in my possesion. Please help!

LARRY CORRALESJanuary 17, 2012
Arlington, TX



I am so happy that these tumors or not being ignored. I was diagnosed more than 3 years ago and have been followed by scans now every 4 - 6 months. I like to think of my tumor as a chronic condition but know the time will come when I will need treatment. I am hoping that this study will benefitmany like myself with LG glioma

Gayle December 19, 2011



This is outstanding! I am a LGG survivor and have had surgical intervention, now showing suspected progression. We desperately need to "identify early clinical and neurocognitive changes that could precede changes observed on imaging scans". This study could change many lives. Many thanks to these researchers!!

Amy December 16, 2011



Read all comments (4) >>


     

Email: *

Email, first name, comment and security code are required fields; all other fields are optional. With the exception of email, any information you provide will be displayed with your comment.

First * Last
Name:
Title Field Facility
Work:
City State
Location:

Comments: *
To prevent comment spam, please type the code you see below into the code field before submitting your comment. If you cannot read the numbers in the below image, reload the page to generate a new one.

Captcha
Enter the security code below: *

Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Specialty:

No Specialty Chosen

Set Specialty

 
 
 
 
http://imaging-radiation-oncology.advanceweb.com/Webinar/Editorial-Webinars/ImagingRadiology-Technology-to-Improve-Patient-Care-Increase-Business.aspx
http://shop.advanceweb.com/index.php/scrubs.html?trk=SPSCIRT12
http://www.burwin.com
http://www.iudmed.com
 
http://shop.advanceweb.com/index.php/scrubs.html?trk=SPSCIRL12