|
References
- Laya, M.B., Larson, E.B., Taplin, S.H., & White, E. (1996). Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 88(10), 643-9.
- Burrell, H.C., Sibbering, D.M., Wilson, A.R., Pinder, S.E., et al. (1996). Screening interval breast cancers: Mammographic features and prognosis factors. Radiology, 199(3), 811-7.
- Sickles, E.A. (1991). Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: Results in 3,184 consecutive cases. Radiology, 179(2), 463-8.
- Burrell, H.C., Pinder, S.E., Wilson, A.R., Evans, A.J., et al. (1996). The positive predictive value of mammographic signs: A review of 425 non-palpable breast lesions. Clinical Radiology, 51(4), 277-81.
- Mahesh, M. (2004). AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: Digital mammography: an overview. Radiographics, 24(6), 1747-60.
- www.fda.gov/cdrh/mammography/scorecard-statistics.html. Accessed April 5.
- Pisano, E.D., & Yaffe, M.J. (2005). Digital mammography. Radiology, 234(2), 353-62.
- Pisano, E.D, Gatsonis, C., Hendrick, E., Yaffe, M., et al. (2005). Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast cancer screening. The New England Journal of Medicine, 353(17), 1773-83.
|